Human Design Websites

SPEED ManifestingPartner LinkLori Mitchell shows you how to live an abundant, prosperous and balanced life in 7 simple steps plus one magical key. Learn the secrets of attracting the flow of money to you, and the way to continue increasing abundance as you finally live in NOW. Recommended by Bob Doyle and Dolf deRoos.

Views: 345


Your rating: None Average: 3.6 (37 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

The Human Design SystemPartner LinkAn extensive site dedicated to the exploration and education in Human Design.

Views: 70


Your rating: None Average: 3.1 (10 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Human Design : Where Science meets Spirituality : The 21st Century Self-Remembering DevicePartner LinkFind out about your own Personal Human Design through accessing personal reports for yourself and your friends and family! This is vital 21st Century knowledge that everyone can easily find out about and use practically in their lives.

Views: 32


Your rating: None Average: 3.8 (6 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Better ConnectionsHelping people experience "Better Connections" in all their relationships. Better Connections exists to help people improve communication, understanding, increase personal satisfaction, maximize strengths and talents, create a life plan for personal development,and discover purpose.

Views: 28


Your rating: None Average: 3 (15 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Can you see what I see?Partner LinkFind your life purpose. Learn to empower and heal yourself. Finally do what you love and be rewarded for it.

Views: 21


Your rating: None Average: 3.6 (8 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

www.LiveLifeThrive.comPartner LinkThis is an motivational website that promotes individual growth and development by offering educational tele-seminars with leading experts in the fields of spirituality, psychology, coaching,intuition and inspirational audio/video presentations, articles providing a platform for personal awareness.

Views: 19


Your rating: None Average: 3.4 (11 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Living Your SpiritHelping you live out your spirit.

Views: 16


Your rating: None Average: 3.4 (9 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Exoconsciousness - Rebecca Hardcastle, Ph.D.Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle is the renowned creator of Exoconsciousness and author of Exoconsciousness: Your 21st Century Mind. A transpartisan advocate for Exopolitics--Peace on Earth, Peace in Space.

Views: 13


Your rating: None Average: 3.1 (13 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Knowledge Has PowerIntended to build a centralized knowledge base for the purpose of unifying thoughts to improve the planet and the state of its inhabitants.

Views: 10


Your rating: None Average: 3.4 (8 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Melinda's VisionsMelinda's Visions is where you will find the most powerful White, Black, High Magic Spells, Voodoo and live psychics. Our service is fast, accurate, discreet and professional offering the BEST Psychics, Mediums and Spell Casters on the internet today.

Views: 6


Your rating: None Average: 4.1 (7 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Joe Simmons - Metaphysical Life CoachPartner LinkJoe Simmons shares perspectives that give us freedom to experience love, forgiveness, happiness, connectedness, confidence, empowerment, abundance, increased self-esteem and celebration, which help us to realize, first-hand, that life is rich and spicy.

Views: 5


Your rating: None Average: 3.8 (5 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Minister OrdinationThe Church of Spiritual Humanism offers free online minister ordinations. As a minister you can legally perform.

religious ceremonies like weddings, funerals, invocations, baby namings, and commitment services.

Views: 4


Your rating: None Average: 3 (7 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

87ConnectPartner LinkMake new connections, improve the ones you have.

Learn the dynamics of Human Design that reveal several unique types, how they operate and which types you are most compatible with. Whether you're a Certified Human Design Specialist or have just had a reading create a profile which includes 7 areas of Human Design Criteria.

Views: 3


Your rating: None Average: 4 (1 vote)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

TazatiTazati Anti Aging Facial System brings you "20 Minute Magic" Natural invigorating face lift for radiant beauty at every age.

Views: 3


Your rating: None Average: 4 (3 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Doing Your Work: The Pathway of the Whole Persondoing your work is the result of 21 years of working with clients in their emotional recovery to bring acceptance, love and true healing to the wounding that we acquire in our families and relationships. The goal is to liberate our emotional voice and move into being a whole person.

Views: 2


Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Dr. Katie GarnettPartner LinkDr. Katie Garnett, PAC Coach, The One Command Certified Leader, Founder, Behavioral DNA and co-Founder, Programs for Awakening.

Views: 2


Your rating: None Average: 3.3 (6 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Erickson NLP Institute"Neuro" is about Your Mind and How you Think. "Linguistic" is How You Use Your Language and How it Affects You. "Programming" tells How You Sequence Your Actions to Achieve your Goals.

Views: 2


Your rating: None Average: 2 (1 vote)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Life Coaching - Kamjah CoachingMaster Certified NLP Life Coach Geoffrey Schmidt coaches on life, relationships, career and business.

Views: 2


Your rating: None Average: 2 (6 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Arvesta CommunicationsAmerica will bend but will never break...

Views: 1


Your rating: None Average: 2.7 (3 votes)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.

Bobbi Anderson - Pain Management CoachChronic Pain - emotional and/or physical is a big deal in our world today. Bobbi offers different ways to manage that chronic pain.

Views: 1


Your rating: None Average: 3 (1 vote)

* Hover over the stars and click to rate this Human Design website.


Legal :: New York Workplace Accident Lawyer

Workplace accidents happen more than what people realize. If a workplace accident should happen to you and you live in New York, you will need a New York workplace accident lawyer. If you hire a New York workplace accident lawyer, you will be more likely to get the compensation that you deserve for your time lost at work and any pain or suffering.

Do You Need to Hire a New York Workplace Accident Lawyer?

If you got hurt on the job, and you end up losing time at work and have medical bills because of the accident, you need to hire a New York workplace accident lawyer. Additionally, if you filed for Worker's Compensation and were denied, you need to hire a New York workplace accident lawyer. You will also need a New York workplace accident lawyer is if you are discriminated against because you got hurt on the job. An example of this would be having your hours cut or getting fired because you got hurt on the job. If you want to get all the compensation you deserve after getting hurt on the job, hire a New York workplace accident lawyer.

Workplace Accident Cases

There are many types of workplace injuries that could occur where you would need an accident lawyer.

* Slips and trips. Many work related accidents are from slipping and tripping over work tools or on wet floors.

Many times there are even just dents in the floor of your workplace that could cause you to trip and get hurt. If you fall at work, and get hurt, be sure to contact a New York workplace accident lawyer.

* Falling from heights. Falling from heights is a common injury, especially on construction jobs. If you get hurt from falling from heights on a construction job, make sure to call a New York Construction Injury Lawyer.

* Objects falling. Objects falling from heights or off shelves are another common workplace injury. Contact a New York workplace accident attorney, so that you can be recompensed for any medical expenses, loss time at work, and your pain and suffering.

There are other ways to get hurt on the job, such as electrocution or getting hurt in a car accident on the way to work or in a company vehicle. It does not matter how you got hurt on the job, make sure to get a contact a New York workplace accident attorney if you got hurt.

Finding a New York Workplace Accident Attorney

If you have a workplace related accident, you can find a New York workplace accident attorney by look through your local phone book, watching local television commercials or searching the Internet. Once you find a few accident attorneys, be sure to talk to more than one so you will pick the right New York workplace accident attorneys. There are different accident lawyers that specialize in different types of personal injury. You want the best New York workplace accident attorney that will get you the most compensation for your injuries.


Impaired drivers being targeted - Cleveland Social Issues

As part of a national law enforcement initiative, police will be out looking for drivers who appear to be impaired. The Ohio Highway Patrol and local police departments are working together to reduce traffic accidents over the Labor Day Holiday 3-day weekend. The national program, "Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over", has, as its primary goal, accident reductions No Drunk Driving discouraging impaired drivers from getting behind the wheel of the car or by removing impaired drivers from the roadways and a secondary goal of promoting safe driving practices, such as wearing seatbelts. The "crackdown" began on 15 August 2014 and will extend through the 1st of September.

Approximately 10,000 people lose their lives every year due to drunk driving accidents. While 2013 was the "safest year ever", 2014 has been a safe year relative to traffic fatalities. The intent of marketing campaigns such as the "Drive Sober or Get Pulled Over" is to ensure a continuation of the past success. Last year, 16 Ohioans lost their life due to a traffic accident over the Labor Day holiday, with half of those fatalities resulting from impaired drivers. The funding for the enhanced enforcement was made possible from funds through the Ohio Traffic Safety Office from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Motorists traveling through the State of Ohio have undoubtedly seen highway signage asking drivers to report individuals who appear to be impaired to the Ohio Highway Patrol (dial #677). However, with the enhanced enforcement, motorists are likely to see significantly DUI Cases police presence on the roadways in addition to "check points" strategically posted.

While police presence and checkpoints are designed to stop impaired drivers, the public awareness program is a campaign to remind motorists not to drive impaired in the first place. The "they will see you before you see them" service announcement in the form of video and commercials serves as that reminder. The consequences for drunk driving in Ohio include for a 1st Offense: Jail (3 days to 6 months), Fines ($250-$1000), and Driving Suspension (6 months to 3 years) and increases with each subsequent offense. For a 4th offense, the penalties are truly significant: Jail (60 days to 1 year), Fines ($800 - $10,000) and Driving Suspension (3 years to Permanent). As a reminder, a motorist (21 and older) is't Drive Drunk-answers/speeding-ticket--25-over-394963.html considered to be an impaired driver with a blood alcohol content (BAC) level of .08% or higher. A motorist under the age of 21 is considered to be an impaired driver with a BAC of .02% or higher. An example of "how much is too much" would be an individual weighing 140 pounds is considered impaired at 3 drinks and a drunk driver at 4 drinks where one drink is equivalent to one 12 oz beer or 5 oz glass of wine or 1. Learn what to do during a Truck Accident situation. In case you're looking for some information on Need Attorney visit now! oz shot of hard liquor. Someone weighing 200 pounds would be considered impaired at 4 drinks and drunk at 5 drinks.

What can a person who wishes to celebrate the holiday weekend with alcohol do to avoid becoming an impaired driver? The obvious answer is to "not get behind the wheel of a car". But the real answer comes from "planning ahead". Anticipation is better than problem solving. By anticipating imbibing, one can plan their actions while they are not under the influence. Possible action strategies include: staying at where one is celebrating (until no longer intoxicated), having a designated driver, or calling for taxi services. Reducing the amount of one's drinking alcohol and drinking water while celebrating will also help one in making better decisions. Plan ahead relative to the amount of alcohol one expects to drink and the time one wishes to stop drinking also assists in making better decisions. Drunk driving is a bad decision that can be avoided.


How to Find a Qualified California DUI Defense Lawyer by Nors Davidson

More than 210,000 attorneys are licensed to practice law in California. Of that number, 156,000 lawyers actively practice and provide legal services to the Articles About Driving than 38 million state residents. The Office of Traffic and Safety reports more than 180,000 people are arrested each year in California for driving under the influence.

At some point in their career, many California attorneys represent a person arrested for driving under the influence. However, very few of these lawyers, even those who regularly represent clients in DUI cases, are qualified to do so. The simple fact is that driving under the influence defense is a specialized area of the law, requiring training and experience beyond that which attorneys ordinarily receive during the course of a general law practice.

Accordingly, deciding upon which attorney to hire merits careful consideration. A skilled DUI defense attorney in California may make a significant difference in the outcome because all cases have the potential for a reduced sentence, dismissal or a finding of not guilty following trial. However, if the client decides not to risk taking the case to trial, a skilled drunk driving defense attorney must work to minimize the impact and reduce the consequences No Drinking And Driving negotiating the best possible settlement.

Many mistakes can be made by those arrested for a driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The most common mistake is not hiring a qualified DWI attorney, followed by delaying the hiring of a qualified attorney until critical time limits have passed and valuable rights are lost. Among the most valuable rights which may be lost is the opportunity to challenge the automatic suspension of a California driver's license or privilege to drive in the state of California following a DUI arrest.

Additionally, those accused of DUI should seriously consider hiring an attorney because driving under the influence cases become progressively more complex and the penalties upon conviction become more severe if a person has more than one driving under the influence conviction. Furthermore, increases in penalties, called enhancements, may apply if the breath or blood test indicated high blood alcohol levels, the driver is accused of refusing to submit to a chemical test, or if a person other than the driver is injured in a DUI accident.

Understandably, people want to minimize the expense of hiring an attorney. However, it is important to understand that the least expensive attorney is seldom the best. Typically, the least expensive attorney is inexperienced or will handle a large number of cases and be unable to deliver a high level of service to individual clients. On the other hand, merely hiring the most expensive attorney is no guarantee of a better result. While the outcome may depend upon the ability of the attorney, the specific facts of the case and circumstances surrounding the arrest are a critical component as well.

Furthermore, anyone seeking an attorney to handle a DUI case should know that the seemingly most qualified lawyer or law firm may not necessarily be the best. People are often attracted to a law firm based upon the reputation of a particular attorney or publications which that attorney may have written. However, many attorneys devote significant time and resources developing their individual or firm resume as a marketing tool rather than working on client cases.

In fact, it is not uncommon for the named attorney at a law office to not handle any aspect of a client's case whatsoever. For this reason, anyone considering hiring a lawyer should obtain a commitment that the leading attorney will actually work on the case. Additionally, some attorney rating services will only review an attorney for a fee. For this reason, ratings may not be an accurate indicator of the attorney's skill and may not translate into high quality legal services being delivered to clients.

Membership in professional organizations and attendance at seminars focusing on DUI defense may demonstrate an attorney's commitment to the specialty. Learn what to do during a Truck Accident situation. In case you're looking for some information on Accident Help visit now!Such a commitment directly benefits the client. Similarly, California DUI defense law firms with more than one attorney specializing in DUI defense should demonstrate commitment to clients by regularly sending its attorneys to practice related training and seminars.

In conclusion, while no attorney can guarantee a particular result, the information detailed above will maximize the probability of finding the most qualified attorney to handle a driving under the influence the case in order to ensure the most favorable result.

For More Information:


Common Criminology Definitions - InfoBarrel

Below are some common criminological definitions from my University days. These are by no means exhaustive but should give you a good starting point for common subjects / themes in criminology.


Eugenics is a concept heavily rooted in Darwin's Theory of Evolution. Sir Francis Galton, Eugenics creator, defined the concept as the study of agencies under social control that may improve or impair the racial qualities of future generations either physically or mentally. Under this theory, criminality was viewed as a genetic problem passed down from earlier generations. As a result, people equated criminality with physical deformities and mental retardation. At the time of Eugenics creation, there was a growing concern that these abnormalities would continue to spread throughout the population, eventually leading to the demise of the human race. Therefore, in order to save western civilization, eugenicists argued for the sterilization of people with these unwanted qualities in order to improve the human race. This theory is extremely problematic as it has essentially been proven to rely on racism and as a result has led to such problems as the Holocaust as well as the Alberta sterilization act which condoned the sterilization of over 2000 people, mainly aboriginal and poor. This theory is still significant in that people still believe that the human genome project may provide an explanation as to how crime and deviance are genetically coded thereby essentially providing another reason to practice eugenics.


A criminological theory which emerged in the 19th century and argued that social relations and events (including crime) can be studied scientifically using methods derived from the natural sciences. Its aim is to search for, explain and predict future patterns of crime utilizing biological, psychological and sociological disciplines in an attempt to identify key causes of crime which are thought to lie outside of a criminal's control. French and Belgium statisticians first applied positivism to criminology in light of the work. Adolphe Quetlelet found that crime rates were not random but mostly constant. He therefore inferred that crime obeyed the same rules as physical phenomenon like the movement of stars. However, in addition, Cesare Lombroso and his atavistic criminal research heavily influenced this criminological theory. Lombroso argued that criminals had similar physical features and as a result could be differentiated from non-criminals.

Positivism attempted to shift the focus of the criminal justice system back on to the criminal as opposed to classicism which focused on the criminal act. Also, in contrast to classicism, they viewed crime as deterministic disregarding the role of free will in its act. This has been a heavy criticism of positivism as it neglects to acknowledge free and rational choice.


This is an approach to criminology which heavily relies upon the notion of free will and rational acts. It was developed in the late 18th century and early 19th century by reformers who sought to create a clear and legitimate criminal justice system based on equality as opposed to the popular system of trial by ordeal. Central to the system of classicism in the idea that punishment should be proportionate to the criminal act and should be viewed as a deterrent by possible criminals. Two philosophers, Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, heavily influenced this theory. Beccaria argued that society should create laws that may infringe upon the rights of a few but largely result in greater happiness for many. He maintained that punishment should be greater than the pleasure derived from the criminal act. Bentham argued that punishment should be calculated to match the harm caused to society by the criminal act and therefore argued for the abolishment of the death penalty while promoting his penal institution, the panopticon, as an alternate form of punishment. Classical criminologists focused criminal act as opposed to the criminal themselves as positivism did. This theory of criminology is important because it still has implications in the criminal justice system today. Prisons are similarly built to Bentham's panopticon and in Canada, we still do not use the death penalty.

The panopticon

The panopticon was a theoretical design for the penitentiary created by the philosopher and classicist Jeremy Bentham. As classicism argued for a more humane and proportionate form of punishment, Bentham designed this type of penal institution. The panopticon involved having the cells of prisoners surround the guard tower while being illuminated so that the guards could surveille the prisoners. However, prisoners would not be able to see into the guard towers, thereby restricting their ability to know if they were being watched or not. Benthams primary motivation for this design was the idea that the few would be surveilling the many. Foucault later argued that this design could be adopted to the factory, barracks and school. Bentham's panopticon is extremely significant to the study of criminology in that its principles are still applied today. In prisons, the guard tower is still employed with limited view as to what is going on within it as well as the increased use of closed circuit television cameras within the prison. Prisoners do not know whether they are being watched but do know that they have the possibility.

Born Criminal

The born criminal is a positivistic theory. Positivism argued that criminality was determined and undermined the notion of free will. The theory of the born criminal is that criminal's have a predisposition to crime that is genetically passed down from generation to generation. As a result, they have no control over whether or not they will commit a crime in the future. Cesare Lombroso created this idea through his research on the atavistic criminal. Lombroso studied known criminals in southern Italy in an attempt to discover common traits among them, thereby leading researchers to identify criminals before they committed crimes. Lombroso's research led him to conclude that criminals were atavists or evolutionary throwbacks which could be identified by big sloping foreheads, large jaws, and big ears. However, as Lombroso's research was flawed, so to is the theory of the born criminal. Firstly, Lombroso's research was based on caught criminals, therefore he selectively disregarded an unknown percentage of criminals in his study. Secondly, his research led him only to examine southern Italians and his physical traits were not in common with criminals but with southern Italians in general. Lastly, the notion of the born criminal largely undermines the notion of free will and rational choice. Despite the problems of this theory, it is still both significant and dangerous to the study of criminality. The notion of the born criminal has contributed to such theories as Eugenics as it argues that criminalitiy is inherited and eugenics argued for the restricted reproduction of criminals and others with physical and mental problems in order to breed out these undesirable qualities from society.

Trial by Ordeal

Trial by ordeal was a process used mainly by the Church before the creation of classical criminology. These trials involved alleged criminals enduring some form of punishment in order to determine their guilt. This often included mutilation, flogging, public humiliation and branding. Escape from the punishment was often viewed as an indication of innocence as it was seen that God had intervened on behalf of the alleged criminal in order to stop the punishment. These punishments were also carried out in public in order to serve as a type of deterrent both to the alleged criminal as well as other criminals.

The trial by ordeal is important to criminology as it provided the reasons for change. Philosophers began to argue for reform, citing that this type of trial was unjust and problematic in that people were being punished before their guilt was determined. This eventually led to the classicist movement which argued for a fair and just trial, abolishment of the death penalty, and a focus of punishment on the criminal act rather than the criminal themselves.


Ethnography is the study of small groups of people and of micro social situations and contexts with emphasize being on understanding how these people socially construct and interpret their worlds. In order to do this, the study of ethnography is done covertly rather than overtly in order to ensure the ethnographer does not interfere with the behaviour of the people he is studying which is referred to as the observer effect. Ethnography is studied two different ways; the first using participant observation and the second utilizing the anthropological gaze. Participant observation involves the ethnographer assuming a role within the group studied and recording his findings. However, the ethnographer must ensure that he does not get so close to the group that he loses objectivity, often referred to as 'going native'. The second method, the anthropolical gaze, involves the ethnographer watching a specific group in order to understand them. This involves the ethnographer keeping a distance between their subjects and themselves. This practice can also be problematic in that it can result in an observer effect whereby the people studied come to know they are being studied and change their behaviour. Another problem with this practice is that the ethnographer may witness a situation in which they would like to help but they cannot due to the risk of compromising their research. This practice is especially useful in studying areas like workplace crime which people are often hesitant about discussing openly.

Informal Social Control

Informal social control is usually a set of rules within society or a micro organization such as a neighbourhood which are not explicitly stated, however, they are understood by members of that group. Shaming, criticism, disapproval, and guilt often enforce this type of control. Sociologists do understand the importance of such rules however; they maintain that as societies grow, formal rules such as codified law become more important to order for the population. Despite the emphasis of formal social controls, informal controls also are significantly important to society in populations where social controls are lacking, such as ghetto neighbourhoods. Informal social controls are significantly interesting to ethnographers as they represent the ways in which people have socially constructed and interpret their world. These controls are significant to society because they are the responses of society to unwanted behaviour that is often not codified by law such as the responses by MADD to drunk driving before changes were made to existing law.


Ethnocentrism poses a detrimental problem to the study of comparative criminology. Comparative criminology is the study of crime as it manifests itself globally in an effort to explain crime which occurs domestically. However, ethnocentrism is the belief that generalizations from one country apply equally to other countries globally, that theft in America is the same as theft in China. As time and space convergence continues to increase, comparative criminology's importance simultaneously continues to grow because crimes have started to involve multiple countries, such as child pornography on the internet spreading across boarders. However, its findings become problematic as they are sometimes based on the fictitious belief of ethnocentrism being that laws apply universally to countries across the globe.

Cultural Relativism

Cultural relativism is the belief that ethical truths are only true when discussed in relation to a specific culture. That is that nothing is universally right or wrong, but rather is only right or wrong when discussing a culture like American culture. This theory is important because it undermines what comparative criminology seeks to discovery and that is how crime manifests itself globally. However, as a cultural relativistic view argues that nothing is universally right or wrong, one cannot compare crime globally because what is right in one culture may not be exactly right in another culture. This theory is the opposite of ethnocentrism in that ethnocentrism argues that generalizations can be applied globally in an effort of comparison.

Cultural relativism is problematic in that it provides a scapegoat in the definition of universal rights and standards of living. It is impossible to establish universal rights in the world because rights and wrongs can only be established in relation to a given culture. This is problematic for the notion of international law as there can be no such thing, rather these problems must always be handled culturally.

Occupational Crime

Occupational crime is often viewed as part-time crime where it is motivated by personal gain. This type of crime is often viewed as a supplementation to wages or as a perk by employees. Jason Ditton argued that there were three different types of occupational crime, fiddling, dealing, and stealing. Stealing involved direct theft from the employer by an employee, dealing involved stealing from the employer but by a number of conspiring employees. Fiddling is a situation whereby an employee steals from a customer by inflating prices and pocketing the profits or sometimes where both the customer and employee alter prices in an effort to steal from the company. This type of crime is extremely important to society for a number of reasons. First, it is often performed covertly so that little is known about the true phenomenon of workplace crime. Secondly, the effects of this type of crime are largely felt by the customer as any loses sustained by the employer through occupational crime are passed on to the customer through increases prices. Lastly, the government also feels the effects of workplace crime as these profits are undeclared and therefore the government loses money on potential taxation.

Occupational crime has often been studied by ethnographers with an effort to understand its phenomenon like Gerald Mars and Jason Ditton. Both these ethnographers argued that workplace crime is a regular occurrence though largely not discussed.

Area Offender Rates

An Area offender rate is the number of offenders which reside in a specific geographical area. This rate is similar to area offence rates which record the number of offences which occur within a given geographical area. On occasion, when taken together, both offender rates and offence rates do coincide especially when dealing with instances of repeat vicitimization such as domestic abuse. However, more frequently, there is large difference between both these rates, especially when dealing with crimes similar to that of vandalism and theft. Area offender rates though do provide significant information to police when dealing with sexual offenders as it provides police with a geographical representation of offender residences to compare with offence locations. On the other hand, these rates also are problematic in that they do not provide a full clear picture of offender residences because they are based upon know offenders. Therefore, only a selected population of offenders are represented within these statistics.

Area Victimization Rate

An area victimization rate is similar to area offence rate in that it measures the number of offences within a specific geographical area. However, where area offence rates include crimes committed against businesses, area victimization rates do not. Rather, area victimization rates record offences against people living in a specific geographic area, regardless of where they occur, excluding those offences which occur against businesses. These statistics are beneficial because they are often gathered through victimization surveys which help reveal more crime than is reveal through official police records. In addition, area victimization rates are especially useful in mapping crime which occurs within specific geographical areas such as ghetto neighbourhoods or crimes which occur against minorities living in a given neighbourhood.

Adversarial System

The adversarial system is the current judicial process used in North America. It is characterized by a competition between the state and the defence as a synonym for adversarial is opponent. This system has three major players involved, the judge who is responsible for ensuring fair and equal opportunity within the trail. The second player is the defence who is responsible defending the accused during the trial. The last player is the prosecutor who is responsible for presenting and laying the criminal charges against the accused. This type of judicial system evolved from the inquisitive system whereby the judge was responsible for the investigate phase and any pre-trial actions. This system has recently been heavily criticized by Laws Of Driving theorists in that it promotes a competition between the prosecutor and defence rather than promoting the search for justice. A lawyers track record is based upon whether or not they win a trial rather than whether or not they have achieved justice.

General Deterrence

General Deterrence is a goal within criminal sentencing which seeks to prevent other potential criminals from committing similar crimes to the crime currently being punished by making an example of offender. General deterrence strives to influence behaviour by reducing the likelihood of future citizens turning to crime as opposed to specific deterrence whose aim is to reduce recidivism or repeat offending. General deterrence is not a new concept but rather existed alongside trials by ordeal. These types of trials subjected alleged criminals to physical punishment in order to determine guilt. However, the punishment also served to reduce the likelihood that other citizens would turn to crime once they witnessed these brutal punishments. General deterrence is also related to psychological theory of operant and classical conditioning in that these theories believe that peoples behaviour can be influenced by stimuli incurred after an action, general deterrence represents an example of positive punishment for future criminals.

Lex Talionis

The term lex talionis refers to a law of retributive justice based on the notions derived from the oldest legal code, the Hammurabi of Ancient Babylon, while its literal definition can be traced back to the Old Testament being, "an eye for an eye". This concept argues that the essential characteristic of justice should be revenge. This concept is dangerous to a society of order in that it promotes individuals taking justice into their own hands in order to extract revenge. The classical school of criminology was the first to speak out against the concept of lex talionis when they argued for the disbandment of the death penalty as it provides no chance for penance or rehabilitation but rather is a concrete example of retributive justice. Lex talionis and the notion of eye for an eye, despite its primitiveness, is still highly influential in society today through the continued use of both the death penalty and life imprisonment. Both of these punishments only serve to punish the offender equally to the pain they have caused in society without offering a change at rehabilitation.

Manichean World View

This is a viewpoint of the world which is underlined by the notion of dualism, it considers the world as a battlefield for control between an evil material god and a good spiritual god. Manicheanism contends that there is a constant struggle between these good and evil forces with no area in the middle, everyone is either good or evil. This religion was founded by Mani over hundreds of years ago. This world view is significant to the study of criminology because it reflected in such criminological theories as positivism. Positivism argues that people are either born criminal or they are not born criminal. One of its most influential contributors, Cesare Lombroso, argued that criminals could be identified by physical characteristics and indirectly argued that criminal behaviour was deterministic thereby revealing a Manichean view of criminal behaviour. This theory is significant in society today because powerful people like George Bush subscribe to the theory and base wars around an axis of evil.

Natural Justice

Natural Justice emphasizes the basic principles of fairness in legal proceedings, both civil and criminal. Its distinct features are that no one can judge themselves and that no one should be condemned without representation. To be natural, justice must be derived from characteristics all people have in common and not derived from cultures or institutions of a particular society. Natural justice has a number of guidelines which are that a person accused of a criminal charge should be given adequate notice of their proceedings, that the person making the decision should declare any person interest they may have in the proceedings and make a decision in good faith without bias. The proceedings should be conducted so that they are fair to all parties and each party should have equal opportunities to ask questions. Finally, the decision maker should take into account only that which is relevant. This notion of natural justice is contradictory to the idea of cultural relativism in that cultural relativism argues that things can only be right or wrong within a given culture and therefore, cultural relativists would argue that there can be no standard for justice universally. This notion of natural justice is important because it is part of the fundamental rights held by citizens in North America and ensures a fair hearing in determining ones guilt.

Restorative Justice

Restorative justice is based on the notion that responses to crime should emphasize the healing of both offenders and victims. It proposes that offenders and victims should meet after a crime has been committed in an effort to repair the harm done to both the victim and society. It therefore argues that the basic response to crime should be an attempt to mend all damage done to society. This type of justice is significant to the study of criminology as it presents an alternative form of justice and punishment than has typically been presented. Classical criminology emphasized the need for punishment without mention of victims, where as positivistic criminology emphasized the need to treat the criminal, both in contrast the motivation surround restorative justice. This notion is highly influential in the Canadian criminal justice system and demonstrated through community service. Similarly, there has been an increase in alternative forms of punishment reflecting restorative justice such as drunk drivers who have killed people behind the wheel meeting with the families of victims in order to understand what it is they have done.


This is the opposite of restorative justice which seeks the mend the damage done by offenders to society by having victims an offenders discuss the committed crime. Retributivism argues that criminals should be punished rather than rehabilitated. Supporters of this theory maintain that stiff punishments will act as general deterrents persuading potential criminals not to commit crimes. They argue that in order to maintain the balance of justice, people must be punished deservingly. Retributivistic punishment is not new but rather an old notion related to the concept of lex talionis which believes in an eye for an eye. This type of punishment was used in trials by ordeal where people were punished for crimes physically in an effort to deter future criminals. This concept is important to the study of crime today because of the increasing use of criminalization and penal populism. The answer to crime is slowly being transformed from rehabilitation to punishment which is clearly demonstrated in America as their incarceration rate has steadily increased over the past decade.

Cognitive Behaviourism

The cognitive behavioural theory assumes that maladaptive thinking patterns cause maladaptive behaviour and 'negative' emotions. This theory suggests that in order to change a persons behaviour, for example from criminal to non-criminal, an individuals thoughts or cognitive patterns, must be altered. Treatment involves the person or criminal identifying both the thoughts and behaviours that are causing the distress and making an attempt to change those thoughts thereby altering their behaviour. In some cases, people may have fundamental beliefs called schemas which are flawed and need some modification. The social information process created by Crick and Dodge can be viewed as a cognitive behaviourist theory. It argued that individuals move through six states of processing social information and if a person does not progress properly through each stage, they would have an inability to socially interpret interactions. Crick and Dodge said that criminals represented individuals who did not progress properly and as a result have difficulty establishing proper behaviour within a social environment. When applied to criminology, this theory tends to be positivistic in that it views criminality as an illness to be treated rather than a temporary lack of ration thought as classicists would argue.

Criminology Psychology

Criminological psychology is the application of psychological theory and ivestigation to the understanding, explaining, and attempting to change criminal behaviour. This term was introduced to more accurately describe the application of psychology to antisocial behaviour which previously only had the term forensic psychology describing it. Early Criminal psychologist, such as Sir Cyril Burt had three basic assumptions about criminal behaviour, that it was biologically and psychologically predetermined, that criminals were in some way different from law-abiding citizens and that criminal behaviour is pathological. These three assumptions led psychologists to believe that criminal behaviour was the result of an individual failing or dysfunction and therefore criminal behaviour should be treated, not punished. This notion is positivistic as positivism argued for a focus of the individual in crime study and maintained that the behaviour was determined and the result of an illness which should be treated not punished. These basic assumptions about criminality are somewhat problematic, by claiming that criminality is a psychological dysfunction, psychologists made an assumption about a large population of people. Secondly, if crime was the result of a genetic disposition, criminals would be more or less evenly distributed among upper and lower classes which has not been displayed in criminal statistics.


In the 1930's, there was three main assumptions linking psychology to criminology and they were determinism, differentiation, and pathology. Differentiation is the belief that criminals are in some way, either biologically, psychologically or sociologically different from non-criminals. Two theories have emerged from the concept of differentiation, differential association and differential reinforcement. Differential association was first developed by Edwin Sutherland and is an attempt to account for the acquisition and maintenance of criminal behaviour in terms of association with particular environments and social groups. There are six main points to the theory of differential association and those are that criminal behaviour is learned, taking place through interactions with other people. The main setting for this learning is within close personal groups and the learning includes techniques to carry out various crimes with attitudes and motives supporting the actions of crime. These learning experiences will vary in frequency and importance for each individual and lastly, that the process to learn criminal behaviour is no different from learning other types of behaviour. The concept of differential reinforcement refers to the relationship between the criminal act and the outcome as a result of it. Positive outcomes often are seen as reinforcing this type behaviour.


Impaired or abnormal functioning, or failure to function normally due to a medical abnormality in the functioning of an organ or other part or system of the body, dysfunction is described as a psychological cause of criminal behaviour and is a positivistic view of criminality. The psychiatric profession specializes in the treatment of this type of disorder, consequently, many of the early practitioners applying psychological theories approached the task of dealing with offenders with an implicit understanding of criminal behaviour as a result of an individual failing or dysfunction. The solution for criminal behaviour favoured by practitioners of psychological theory was to rehabilitate the criminal to eliminate the dysfunction causing the criminal behaviour. Change is thus brought about by the application of psychological methods such as psychotherapy, counselling, and group therapy. Therefore, from a psychological perspective, criminal behaviour is a consequence of individual dysfunction, and once the dysfunction is corrected, the individual will no longer by criminal. This theory is problematic in that it sees criminals as either black or white, either having a problem or not having a problem. It neglects to examine crimes of necessities or momentary lacks of judgement.

Forensic Psychology

Forensic psychology is the practice of psychology with the explicit motivation of being used in a court of law. Forensic psychologists are often called upon expert witnesses are therefore allowed to provide opinions about an individual in question. Forensic psychologists are also utilized during jury selection in order to ensure that jurors do not have existing prejudices that could affect the outcome of a trial. Also, these psychologists are often called upon by the police in an effort to create a criminal profile sometimes predicting future behaviour. Forensic psychologists are important to criminology in that they represent one of a selected few types of witnesses that may present opinions within a court case. Also, they are beneficial to stopping repeat offenders by offering insights based upon their knowledge of behaviourisms.

Social Information Processing

Social information processing refers to the way in which people interpret themselves, their environment and their actions. The way one processes the information and interprets it affects their beliefs about what kind of behaviour is acceptable and effective in achieving results. Aggressive people believe that the use of aggressive means is normal, legitimate and will bring about desired results. Aggressive people do not think that their victims suffer. They also interpret their world as hostile and their interactions, no matter how neutral, as being against them and people are out to "get them". This theory has 6 stages, the first two are concerned with encoding and interpretation of social cues, the third is with clarification of goals/some desired endpoint; the fourth is to judge how best to respond to a situation; the fifth is the response decision, and consideration of alternative responses. Drunk Driving Definition, people also consider the consequences and plan to achieve different outcomes. Lastly is behavioural enactment. When applied to criminology, this theory argues that criminals have a inability to properly examine cues and consider possible results. This is another positivistic theory of criminality which argues that criminality should be treated, not punished.

Social Learning Theory

The social learning theory focuses on the learning that occurs within a social context. It considers that people learn from one another, including such concepts as observational learning, imitation, and modelling. Alberta Bandura is considered the leading proponent of this theory. Social learning theory has been applied extensively ot the understanding of aggression. This theory explains human behaviour in terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive, behavioural, and environmental influences. The component processes underlying oberservational learning are attention, retention, motor reproduction and motivation. This theory is similar to Edwin Sutherland's theory of differential association in that Sutherland argued that criminal behaviour was learned through social interaction and was the same as learning any other type of normal interaction. The social learning theory is influential to the study of criminology because it presents an explanation for the reproduction of criminal behaviour. In contrast, positivistic theories have just argued that criminality was determined and classicists argued it was simply a moment of irrational thought without making an attempt to explain how it is learned.


Somatotypes is a theory developed by William Sheldon who studied the physiques of juvenile delinquents in the 1940's. Sheldon argued that there were three different body types, endomorphs, mesomorphs, and ectomorphs. He based his findings on a study of 200 delinquent boys. He argued that endomorphs had a tendency to put on fat, they had small bones and velvety skin while their personality reflected relaxation with a love of luxury, essentially being an extrovert. Sheldon argued that mesomorphs had a predominance of muscle, bone and motor organs. They were muscular however, they personality was very aggressive and assertive. Lastly, the ectomorph was characterized by a predominance of skin, with a lean fragile body. They were sensitive, distractible and frequently had skin troubles. Sheldon published his findings with Eleanor Glueck arguing that mesomorphs accounted for 60% of criminals as their aggressive traits naturally led them to delinquency. This is important because it demonstrates yet another deterministic view of criminality as examining a persons physical traits, similar to Lombroso's theory, can help predict criminality.

Cognitive Maps

The term cognitive map refers to a person's representation of a spatial environment, a mental framework that holds some representation for the spatial arrangement of the physical environment. In essence, cognitive maps are people's mental imprints of their daily routine routes from each location. These maps are acquired though experience. This is significant to the study of crime in that it suggests that people are more likely to commit offences in areas of higher familiarity. It is based on the idea that people are more comfortable in areas which they have knowledge about. Cognitive mapping has proven significant in the criminal profiling as it allows for the police to map out possible locations that offenders may commit crimes due to their mental knowledge and routine activities. It has also been combined with area offender rates as utilizing both together demonstrate where an offender lives and what areas surrounding their residence they could have a possible knowledge of.

Collective Efficacy

Collective efficacy is the ability of a community to collectively express unified values and enforce them against deviant threats, thus reducing crime for the good of everyone. It can also be described as members of a community effectively using their time and energy to join together and patrol their own communities similar to neighbourhood watches. According to Robert Sampson, high crime neighbourhoods lack a collective efficacy as they lack the capacity to define collective goals and effectively organize to achieve them. Therefore, according to this theory, high crime rates could be explained as a result of social disorganization. The motivation driving collective efficacy is to prevent crime through the expression of a common set of values. However, Sampson also noted that collective efficacy can be employed negatively when there are organized criminal groups within a neighbourhood which are capable of influencing the collective efficacy of the neighbourhood with their own negative values. Collective efficacy is an example of informal social controls, but not equal to formal control.

Natural Surveillance

The placement of people and places as well as activities arranged in such a way as to maximize visibility. Natural surveillance involves designing windows, lighting and landscaping to improve the ability to see what it going on around these areas. The purpose of natural surveillance is to constantly allow people to see what is going thereby reducing the opportunity to commit a crime as the increased possibility of witnesses act as a general deterrence to crime. This type of surveillance is useful because it offers an inexpensive method to deter crime. Natural surveillance is significant because it can alter a victims cognitive map. Women often associate locations with a large level of natural surveillance with their cognitive map as an effort of self-policing. By frequently using these locations, women are able to significantly lower the possibility of being victimized as the presence of witnesses has been shown to reduce the likelihood of criminal activity.

Social Disorganization

The concept of social disorganization emerged with the Chicago School's zonal model. Shaw and Mckay argued that social disorganization exists when the structure and culture of a community are incapable of implementing and expressing the values of its own residents. Social disorganization was highly linked to the zone of transition because incoming immigrant communities could not provide for their young people common and clear non-delinquent values and control as a result of the social diversity within the zone. Social disorganization is the opposite of collective efficacy which is the ability for a community to collective express their values which in turn reduces crime. Social disorganization theory is influential to the study of criminology because it incorporates the significance of socio-economic factors which contribute to crime. It emphasizes the fact that the community has a role to play in crime prevention and when the community fails, there is the possibility for criminal activity.


Your business. Your life.  

Learn From Us

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, ullum nullam es possim sed et. Virtute ancillae mel ne, quo ean adhuc del principes persequeris, ius alii pro priae maxima accommodare ea. Zril aliquam fabulas mei in. Epicurei adipisci pro ex, vidisse minimum volupta ius eu vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores.


Eros quaestio explicari ut per. No quo amet necessitatibus, sit ei putent appetere. Lobortis urbanitas efficiantur ut has. Has at modus nemore prodesset. Eleifend abhorreant ullamcorper per cu. Sea vide graeco possim.

Creative thinking inspires great ideas. Get thinking!